xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · BOS skaters · ANA skaters · BOS lines · ANA lines · Matchups

BOS 4 – 2 ANA

Boston Bruins at Anaheim Ducks

Final · Oct 16, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
BOS 51.1% ✓
expected 3.24–3.14 · BOS won 4–2
actual xG
3.64–3.75
xG share, predicted → actual
BOS 51% → 49%49% → 51% ANA
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
On the ice
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from BOS's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = BOS power play · PK = ANA power play · Leading = BOS ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

BOS attacks◀ all strengths
ANA attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: BOS attacks the left net, ANA the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 283 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from BOS's side and mirrored for ANA: “BOS PP” shows BOS's power-play attempts on the left and ANA's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · this game
BOS ANA
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
4 2
Expected goals
3.64 3.75
xG%share of xG
49% 51%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
3 5
Shots on goal
22 28
Attempts
45 71
xG by period · whole game 1st0.7–1.52nd1.0–1.23rd2.0–1.1

The Bruins beat the Ducks 4–2 on the road in a game the chances called about even, BOS 3.6 to ANA 3.7 in expected goals. The Ducks power play made 1.2 xG on 14 attempts.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

all situations · this game
cumulative BOS − ANA xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+0.5−0.5+1−1BOS AHEAD ▲ANA AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative BOS minus ANA expected goals. Above zero BOS is ahead on chances, below zero ANA is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Goals

this game
xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
BOSFrederic Brunet 2nd3:15 PP 0.03
BOSDavid Pastrnak 3rd3:26 PP 0.07
BOSElias Lindholm 3rd8:18 PP 0.62
BOSMatthew Poitras 3rd16:20 0.19
ANATim Washe 1st19:22 0.01
ANABeckett Sennecke 1st19:43 0.08
Who

Skaters

all · whole game · this game
on-ice xG for and against, his own attempts, the net
strength
period
sort
How to read this

Every skater: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time. The chart opens sorted by net, best first; pick another key to re-order it, and click the same key again to flip it. A name opens the player's page. Pick a period and every bar re-lays for that period alone on the same scale as the whole game, so the three periods add up to it; a skater who did not play in it fades to the bottom.

BOS
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Elias LindholmF18:30+0.66Charlie McAvoyD26:54+0.60Pavel ZachaF17:04+0.52James HagensF10:03+0.43Morgan GeekieF19:59+0.40David PastrnakF20:35+0.30Hampus LindholmD25:51+0.22Marat KhusnutdinovF14:35+0.14Frederic BrunetD13:58+0.11JJ PeterkaF14:14+0.05Matthew PoitrasF9:18+0.05Casey MittelstadtF10:25-0.21Mark KastelicF8:59-0.22Tanner JeannotF11:25-0.27Mason LohreiD15:21-0.55Nikita ZadorovD17:42-0.56Fraser MintenF17:05-0.62William BorgenD18:02-0.86
0.50.5111.51.50Hampus LindholmD17:36+0.56Charlie McAvoyD17:27+0.42Fraser MintenF11:27+0.40Marat KhusnutdinovF10:30+0.33JJ PeterkaF12:23+0.32James HagensF9:21+0.23Casey MittelstadtF9:53+0.17Frederic BrunetD11:19+0.17Tanner JeannotF7:30+0.12Elias LindholmF10:50+0.09Mason LohreiD11:58+0.09Matthew PoitrasF9:18+0.05Mark KastelicF7:37+0.04Pavel ZachaF13:05-0.32Morgan GeekieF15:51-0.44Nikita ZadorovD16:16-0.45William BorgenD15:04-0.49David PastrnakF15:55-0.54
0.50.5110David PastrnakF4:10+0.84Morgan GeekieF3:42+0.84Pavel ZachaF2:25+0.84Elias LindholmF2:51+0.64Charlie McAvoyD2:45+0.64Frederic BrunetD1:49+0.20James HagensF0:42+0.20Hampus LindholmD1:05+0.00Mason LohreiD1:04+0.00Fraser MintenF1:01+0.00JJ PeterkaF0:52+0.00Casey MittelstadtF0:24+0.00
0.50.5110Pavel ZachaF1:17+0.00Elias LindholmF4:28-0.07Nikita ZadorovD1:22-0.11Marat KhusnutdinovF3:57-0.18Mark KastelicF1:22-0.26William BorgenD2:58-0.37Tanner JeannotF3:55-0.39Hampus LindholmD6:11-0.46Charlie McAvoyD6:08-0.46Mason LohreiD2:11-0.64Fraser MintenF3:39-1.14
ANA
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Alex KillornF16:06+0.84Roger McQueenF15:14+0.72Nikita KlepovF17:25+0.66Leo CarlssonF20:23+0.64Frank VatranoF13:00+0.35Judd CaulfieldF13:02+0.32Tyson HindsD14:30+0.23Jackson LaCombeD26:26+0.19Tristan LuneauD18:17+0.18Drew HellesonD20:12+0.14Jeff MalottF9:34+0.01Beckett SenneckeF23:12-0.00A.J. GreerF10:55-0.08Nikita NesterenkoF12:10-0.16Cutter GauthierF21:20-0.26Tim WasheF12:34-0.52Pavel MintyukovD16:05-0.62Noah WarrenD14:45-0.77
0.50.5110Drew HellesonD16:30+0.25Alex KillornF11:59+0.23Leo CarlssonF12:54+0.22Nikita KlepovF13:07+0.20Jackson LaCombeD17:10+0.09Roger McQueenF12:05+0.07Jeff MalottF9:34+0.01Frank VatranoF10:05-0.01Judd CaulfieldF7:49-0.04Nikita NesterenkoF10:01-0.08A.J. GreerF10:49-0.08Tristan LuneauD15:40-0.09Pavel MintyukovD14:13-0.12Tyson HindsD12:55-0.15Tim WasheF9:28-0.23Cutter GauthierF12:22-0.24Noah WarrenD12:28-0.31Beckett SenneckeF14:30-0.44
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Alex KillornF3:12+0.78Roger McQueenF2:48+0.65Jackson LaCombeD6:44+0.56Beckett SenneckeF6:38+0.56Cutter GauthierF6:23+0.47Nikita KlepovF4:18+0.46Leo CarlssonF6:07+0.43Judd CaulfieldF5:07+0.37Frank VatranoF2:54+0.36Tristan LuneauD2:37+0.27Pavel MintyukovD0:02+0.00
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Tyson HindsD1:27+0.00Beckett SenneckeF1:20+0.00Leo CarlssonF1:14+0.00Roger McQueenF0:09+0.00Alex KillornF0:47-0.17Drew HellesonD2:43-0.37Cutter GauthierF1:46-0.37Pavel MintyukovD1:14-0.37Jackson LaCombeD1:52-0.47Noah WarrenD1:52-0.47Nikita NesterenkoF1:35-0.47Tim WasheF2:26-0.67

Lines & pairs

all · whole game · this game
most-used units · when they played · on-ice xG lines are by strength · 5v5 shown
strength
period
sort
How to read this

The units that actually played together most at the chosen strength — forward lines and defence pairs at 5v5, the whole group on the ice on the power play or the kill — each with when it was on the ice at that strength across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against / for while the whole unit was out, at that strength only. Sorted by time together; pick another key to re-order, and a name opens the player's page. Pick a period and the strip veils the rest of the game while the bars re-lay for that period alone, on the whole game's scale.

BOS
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
ANA
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF

Matchups

5v5 · this game
every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
order
BOS won the chances ANA won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
DostalKillornCarlssonKlepovNesterenkoGauthierSenneckeGreerMalottWasheVatranoCaulfieldMcQueenLuneauMintyukovLaCombeWarrenHellesonHindsGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3DiPietroPastrnakZachaGeekiePeterkaKhusnutdinovMintenLindholmMittelstadtHagensJeannotKastelicPoitrasLindholmMcAvoyZadorovBorgenLohreiBrunet
How to read this

Rows are BOS's skaters, columns ANA's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

The model

The prediction, scored

🔒 pregame · this game

Before puck drop the engine made BOS a 51.1% favorite, expecting a 3.24–3.14 game — BOS won 4–2, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
BOS 3.243.64 2.282.46 0.821.06
ANA 3.143.75 2.012.31 0.831.21

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

🔒 pregame · this game

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ BOS · ■ ANA.

Likeliest finals (BOS–ANA)probability
3–3 7.0% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–2 6.2% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–4 4.5% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–2 4.0% what happened
2–4 3.8%
4.0%4.4%012.8%13.7%120.5%21.3%222.0%22.1%317.8%17.4%411.7%11.1%56.4%5.9%63.0%2.7%71.8%1.6%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

🔒 pregame · this game

The engine made BOS a 51.1% favorite — ANA controls 49.3% of the predicted xG. Of BOS's 3.24 expected goals, 2.28 should come at 5v5 and 0.82 on the power play; ANA projects 2.01 at 5v5 and 0.83 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 49.7%, Elo at 52.7%.

Where the engine expected the goals

🔒 pregame · this game

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). BOS attacks the left net, ANA the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Context

Tale of the tape

season to date

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

BOSANA
3.01 (15th) Offense
xG for / game
2.81 (23rd)
2.93 (15th) Defense
xG against / game
3.34 (29th)
0.63 (26th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.82 (12th)
0.70 (12th) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
1.06 (31st)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →