xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · ANA skaters · NYR skaters · ANA lines · NYR lines · Matchups

ANA 2 – 5 NYR

Anaheim Ducks at New York Rangers

Final · Oct 19, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
NYR 56.3% ✓
expected 2.87–3.27 · NYR won 2–5
actual xG
2.97–4.49
xG share, predicted → actual
ANA 47% → 40%53% → 60% NYR
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
On the ice
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from ANA's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = ANA power play · PK = NYR power play · Leading = ANA ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

ANA attacks◀ all strengths
NYR attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: ANA attacks the left net, NYR the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 283 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from ANA's side and mirrored for NYR: “ANA PP” shows ANA's power-play attempts on the left and NYR's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · this game
ANA NYR
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
2 5
Expected goals
2.97 4.48
xG%share of xG
40% 60%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
4 6
Shots on goal
31 30
Attempts
62 55
xG by period · whole game 1st1.0–1.72nd1.4–2.13rd0.6–0.6

The Rangers beat the Ducks 5–2 at home, and the chances agreed: NYR out-created ANA 4.5–3.0 in expected goals. The Rangers power play made 0.9 xG on 9 attempts.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

all situations · this game
cumulative ANA − NYR xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+1−1+2−2ANA AHEAD ▲NYR AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative ANA minus NYR expected goals. Above zero ANA is ahead on chances, below zero NYR is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Goals

this game
xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
ANANick Jensen 3rd18:51 0.07
ANAA.J. Greer 3rd19:27 0.06
NYRSean Durzi 1st1:18 0.01
NYRJ.T. Miller 2nd4:38 PP 0.09
NYRGabe Perreault 2nd10:17 0.40
NYROliver Bjorkstrand 2nd13:14 0.30
NYROliver Bjorkstrand 3rd3:26 0.19
Who

Skaters

all · whole game · this game
on-ice xG for and against, his own attempts, the net
strength
period
sort
How to read this

Every skater: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time. The chart opens sorted by net, best first; pick another key to re-order it, and click the same key again to flip it. A name opens the player's page. Pick a period and every bar re-lays for that period alone on the same scale as the whole game, so the three periods add up to it; a skater who did not play in it fades to the bottom.

ANA
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Tristan LuneauD20:47+1.09Leo CarlssonF15:09+0.31Judd CaulfieldF13:25+0.25Tyson HindsD20:16+0.25Tim WasheF15:38-0.04Frank VatranoF14:36-0.05Beckett SenneckeF15:37-0.06Jeff MalottF9:47-0.18Mikael GranlundF16:08-0.35A.J. GreerF13:53-0.41Cutter GauthierF16:12-0.50Alex KillornF18:44-0.51Nikita KlepovF12:55-0.58Roger McQueenF16:25-0.78Jackson LaCombeD20:45-1.15Nick JensenD18:12-1.20Pavel MintyukovD19:17-1.24Noah WarrenD15:28-1.38
0.50.5111.51.50Tristan LuneauD19:01+0.80Tim WasheF11:37+0.37Judd CaulfieldF11:58+0.25Tyson HindsD17:55+0.16Frank VatranoF12:44-0.05Alex KillornF13:47-0.07Leo CarlssonF11:47-0.13Jeff MalottF9:37-0.18A.J. GreerF13:53-0.41Beckett SenneckeF11:23-0.54Nikita KlepovF11:40-0.58Mikael GranlundF10:36-0.60Pavel MintyukovD16:58-0.81Noah WarrenD13:11-0.89Jackson LaCombeD13:24-0.91Cutter GauthierF12:00-0.98Roger McQueenF14:30-1.08Nick JensenD16:34-1.20
0.250.250.50.50Jackson LaCombeD4:19+0.48Mikael GranlundF4:17+0.48Beckett SenneckeF4:14+0.48Cutter GauthierF4:12+0.48Leo CarlssonF3:22+0.44Alex KillornF2:01+0.04Nikita KlepovF1:15+0.00Tristan LuneauD1:13+0.00Roger McQueenF1:12+0.00Frank VatranoF1:05+0.00Pavel MintyukovD0:03+0.00Tim WasheF0:02+0.00
0.250.250.50.50.750.750Nick JensenD1:38+0.00Judd CaulfieldF1:27+0.00Frank VatranoF0:47+0.00Jeff MalottF0:10+0.00Roger McQueenF0:10+0.00Tyson HindsD1:49-0.21Mikael GranlundF1:15-0.22Pavel MintyukovD2:16-0.43Alex KillornF2:56-0.48Noah WarrenD2:17-0.49Tim WasheF3:26-0.70Jackson LaCombeD3:01-0.71
NYR
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Pavel DorofeyevF17:57+1.94J.T. MillerF19:09+1.84Alexis LafrenièreF17:00+1.37Adam FoxD21:48+1.03Mika ZibanejadF18:42+0.95Tye KartyeF14:00+0.81Gabe PerreaultF15:40+0.61Braden SchneiderD19:01+0.37Marcus PetterssonD19:02+0.30Sean DurziD17:21+0.26Oliver BjorkstrandF12:08+0.15Alberts SmitsD15:58+0.03Vladislav GavrikovD21:16+0.01Will CuylleF17:04+0.00Taylor RaddyshF10:01-0.07Justin DowlingF8:56-0.12Noah LabaF15:08-0.45Eeli TolvanenF13:49-0.67
0.50.5111.51.50J.T. MillerF14:06+1.13Tye KartyeF12:01+1.13Pavel DorofeyevF13:46+1.11Marcus PetterssonD16:56+1.00Alexis LafrenièreF12:41+0.66Sean DurziD15:15+0.65Gabe PerreaultF13:24+0.60Mika ZibanejadF14:04+0.53Braden SchneiderD15:07+0.45Adam FoxD16:21+0.40Vladislav GavrikovD17:22+0.09Alberts SmitsD15:58+0.03Will CuylleF12:12-0.05Oliver BjorkstrandF11:00-0.06Taylor RaddyshF10:01-0.07Justin DowlingF8:56-0.12Noah LabaF11:25-0.29Eeli TolvanenF12:00-0.36
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Pavel DorofeyevF4:11+0.83Adam FoxD4:38+0.71J.T. MillerF4:26+0.71Mika ZibanejadF4:21+0.71Alexis LafrenièreF4:18+0.71Gabe PerreaultF1:59+0.31Oliver BjorkstrandF1:08+0.21Will CuylleF1:03+0.21Sean DurziD0:51+0.21Eeli TolvanenF0:30+0.00
0.250.250.50.50J.T. MillerF0:37+0.00Alexis LafrenièreF0:01+0.00Vladislav GavrikovD3:38-0.08Braden SchneiderD3:38-0.08Adam FoxD0:49-0.08Will CuylleF3:33-0.16Noah LabaF3:27-0.16Tye KartyeF1:59-0.31Eeli TolvanenF1:19-0.31Sean DurziD0:58-0.31Marcus PetterssonD1:49-0.40

Lines & pairs

all · whole game · this game
most-used units · when they played · on-ice xG lines are by strength · 5v5 shown
strength
period
sort
How to read this

The units that actually played together most at the chosen strength — forward lines and defence pairs at 5v5, the whole group on the ice on the power play or the kill — each with when it was on the ice at that strength across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against / for while the whole unit was out, at that strength only. Sorted by time together; pick another key to re-order, and a name opens the player's page. Pick a period and the strip veils the rest of the game while the bars re-lay for that period alone, on the whole game's scale.

ANA
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
NYR
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF

Matchups

5v5 · this game
every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
order
ANA won the chances NYR won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
GarandZibanejadLafrenièrePerreaultMillerDorofeyevKartyeTolvanenCuylleLabaDowlingBjorkstrandRaddyshGavrikovFoxPetterssonDurziSchneiderSmitsGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3HussoGreerGauthierMcQueenKillornCarlssonKlepovCaulfieldMalottWasheGranlundVatranoSenneckeHindsLuneauJensenMintyukovLaCombeWarren
How to read this

Rows are ANA's skaters, columns NYR's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

The model

The prediction, scored

🔒 pregame · this game

Before puck drop the engine made NYR a 56.3% favorite, expecting a 2.87–3.27 game — NYR won 2–5, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
ANA 2.872.97 1.962.19 0.770.48
NYR 3.274.49 2.243.56 0.960.93

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

🔒 pregame · this game

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ ANA · ■ NYR.

Likeliest finals (ANA–NYR)probability
3–3 7.0% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–2 6.7% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–4 4.4%
4–4 4.1% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
1–3 3.8%
2–5 2.9% what happened
5.7%3.9%016.3%12.5%123.3%20.2%222.1%21.9%315.9%18.0%49.3%11.9%54.5%6.6%61.9%3.1%71.0%1.9%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

🔒 pregame · this game

The engine made NYR a 56.3% favorite — NYR controls 53.2% of the predicted xG. Of ANA's 2.87 expected goals, 1.96 should come at 5v5 and 0.77 on the power play; NYR projects 2.24 at 5v5 and 0.96 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 55.0%, Elo at 59.8%.

Where the engine expected the goals

🔒 pregame · this game

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). ANA attacks the left net, NYR the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Context

Tale of the tape

season to date

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

ANANYR
2.81 (23rd) Offense
xG for / game
2.99 (17th)
3.34 (29th) Defense
xG against / game
2.62 (6th)
0.82 (12th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.74 (18th)
1.06 (31st) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.63 (6th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →