xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · BOS skaters · DAL skaters · BOS lines · DAL lines · Matchups

BOS 2 – 3 DAL

Boston Bruins at Dallas Stars

Final / OT · Oct 20, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
DAL 56.5% ✓
expected 2.71–3.09 · DAL won 2–3 in OT
actual xG
2.15–4.07
xG share, predicted → actual
BOS 47% → 35%53% → 65% DAL
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
On the ice
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from BOS's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = BOS power play · PK = DAL power play · Leading = BOS ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

BOS attacks◀ all strengths
DAL attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: BOS attacks the left net, DAL the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 283 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from BOS's side and mirrored for DAL: “BOS PP” shows BOS's power-play attempts on the left and DAL's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · this game
BOS DAL
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
2 3
Expected goals
2.15 4.07
xG%share of xG
35% 65%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
2 5
Shots on goal
20 25
Attempts
43 66
xG by period · whole game 1st1.0–1.22nd1.0–1.13rd0.1–0.6OT0.0–1.1

The Stars beat the Bruins 3–2 in overtime at home, and the chances agreed: DAL out-created BOS 4.1–2.1 in expected goals. The Stars power play made 0.9 xG on 10 attempts.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

all situations · this game
cumulative BOS − DAL xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RDOT+0.5−0.5+1−1+1.5−1.5+2−2BOS AHEAD ▲DAL AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative BOS minus DAL expected goals. Above zero BOS is ahead on chances, below zero DAL is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Goals

this game
xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
BOSMatthew Poitras 1st2:09 0.08
BOSJames Hagens 2nd7:30 0.25
DALMikko Rantanen 2nd2:50 0.25
DALMikko Rantanen 3rd13:38 0.06
DALMikko Rantanen OT3:52 PP 0.21
Who

Skaters

all · whole game · this game
on-ice xG for and against, his own attempts, the net
strength
period
sort
How to read this

Every skater: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time. The chart opens sorted by net, best first; pick another key to re-order it, and click the same key again to flip it. A name opens the player's page. Pick a period and every bar re-lays for that period alone on the same scale as the whole game, so the three periods add up to it; a skater who did not play in it fades to the bottom.

BOS
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.50Morgan GeekieF16:59+0.26James HagensF13:20-0.04Tanner JeannotF9:05-0.04Matthew PoitrasF9:01-0.18Mason LohreiD15:35-0.21David PastrnakF21:41-0.21Fraser MintenF17:11-0.27William BorgenD18:38-0.32Elias LindholmF20:18-0.34Mark KastelicF11:47-0.37Casey MittelstadtF14:58-0.45Pavel ZachaF21:22-0.48Frederic BrunetD16:37-0.49JJ PeterkaF19:18-0.58Marat KhusnutdinovF14:26-0.59Nikita ZadorovD20:48-0.68Hampus LindholmD19:28-0.74Charlie McAvoyD27:04-1.06
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Fraser MintenF13:27+0.02James HagensF11:01+0.00Tanner JeannotF8:32-0.04JJ PeterkaF15:40-0.05Mason LohreiD14:57-0.08Casey MittelstadtF11:47-0.12Marat KhusnutdinovF11:47-0.15Frederic BrunetD13:10-0.16Elias LindholmF11:37-0.17Matthew PoitrasF9:01-0.18William BorgenD16:40-0.20Morgan GeekieF11:15-0.23Nikita ZadorovD17:39-0.23Mark KastelicF10:55-0.25Hampus LindholmD16:45-0.29Pavel ZachaF13:52-0.34Charlie McAvoyD16:56-0.39David PastrnakF14:39-0.53
0.250.250.50.50.750.750David PastrnakF6:07+0.48Charlie McAvoyD5:48+0.48Morgan GeekieF5:44+0.48Pavel ZachaF5:37+0.48Elias LindholmF5:24+0.48Hampus LindholmD0:19+0.00William BorgenD0:16+0.00Mason LohreiD0:08+0.00JJ PeterkaF2:25-0.04James HagensF2:19-0.04Frederic BrunetD2:16-0.04Casey MittelstadtF1:59-0.04Fraser MintenF1:58-0.04
0.250.250.50.50.750.750Pavel ZachaF0:48+0.00Tanner JeannotF0:33+0.00Casey MittelstadtF0:28+0.00Frederic BrunetD0:28+0.00William BorgenD1:42-0.12Mark KastelicF0:48-0.12Mason LohreiD0:30-0.13Fraser MintenF1:46-0.25Marat KhusnutdinovF2:39-0.45Hampus LindholmD2:24-0.45Nikita ZadorovD3:09-0.45Elias LindholmF3:17-0.65Charlie McAvoyD3:04-0.65
DAL
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5222.52.50Mikko RantanenF22:12+2.23Wyatt JohnstonF20:41+2.05Miro HeiskanenD29:33+1.53Jason RobertsonF23:34+1.42Nils LundkvistD15:43+0.71Colin BlackwellF10:07+0.40Kyle CapobiancoD13:32+0.30Roope HintzF17:51+0.29Radek FaksaF10:58+0.21Thomas HarleyD27:50+0.20Joel KivirantaF10:15+0.12Justin HryckowianF12:40+0.04Jamie BennF13:23+0.03Sam SteelF13:57-0.05Lian BichselD16:29-0.14Tyler SeguinF12:34-0.20Arttu HyryF16:22-0.34Tyler MyersD17:47-0.66
0.50.5110Mikko RantanenF14:57+0.84Wyatt JohnstonF14:20+0.74Nils LundkvistD14:29+0.67Radek FaksaF7:50+0.48Colin BlackwellF8:38+0.40Joel KivirantaF7:19+0.39Miro HeiskanenD19:49+0.39Jason RobertsonF17:46+0.34Kyle CapobiancoD13:32+0.30Sam SteelF11:20+0.16Thomas HarleyD21:48+0.07Lian BichselD13:51+0.02Jamie BennF12:35-0.09Arttu HyryF13:38-0.13Justin HryckowianF9:41-0.21Tyler MyersD13:24-0.31Tyler SeguinF11:46-0.32Roope HintzF12:57-0.36
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Mikko RantanenF5:52+0.90Jason RobertsonF5:04+0.78Miro HeiskanenD4:36+0.78Wyatt JohnstonF4:36+0.78Roope HintzF3:15+0.32Justin HryckowianF1:13+0.25Thomas HarleyD1:16+0.12Jamie BennF0:48+0.12Tyler SeguinF0:48+0.12
0.250.250.50.50Nils LundkvistD1:14+0.04Roope HintzF0:45+0.04Wyatt JohnstonF0:39+0.04Mikko RantanenF0:04+0.00Jason RobertsonF0:03+0.00Justin HryckowianF1:46-0.00Colin BlackwellF1:29-0.00Miro HeiskanenD4:08-0.14Lian BichselD2:38-0.16Arttu HyryF2:44-0.21Sam SteelF2:37-0.21Radek FaksaF3:08-0.27Joel KivirantaF2:56-0.27Thomas HarleyD3:46-0.29Tyler MyersD4:23-0.35

Lines & pairs

all · whole game · this game
most-used units · when they played · on-ice xG lines are by strength · 5v5 shown
strength
period
sort
How to read this

The units that actually played together most at the chosen strength — forward lines and defence pairs at 5v5, the whole group on the ice on the power play or the kill — each with when it was on the ice at that strength across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against / for while the whole unit was out, at that strength only. Sorted by time together; pick another key to re-order, and a name opens the player's page. Pick a period and the strip veils the rest of the game while the bars re-lay for that period alone, on the whole game's scale.

BOS
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
DAL
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF

Matchups

5v5 · this game
every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
order
BOS won the chances DAL won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
OettingerRantanenSteelJohnstonSeguinHintzRobertsonBennHryckowianHyryBlackwellFaksaKivirantaHeiskanenHarleyMyersCapobiancoLundkvistBichselGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3SwaymanPastrnakZachaPeterkaGeekieKhusnutdinovMintenLindholmMittelstadtHagensJeannotKastelicPoitrasZadorovBorgenLindholmMcAvoyLohreiBrunet
How to read this

Rows are BOS's skaters, columns DAL's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

The model

The prediction, scored

🔒 pregame · this game

Before puck drop the engine made DAL a 56.5% favorite, expecting a 2.71–3.09 game — DAL won 2–3, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
BOS 2.712.15 2.031.54 0.550.57
DAL 3.094.07 1.962.22 0.820.94

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

🔒 pregame · this game

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ BOS · ■ DAL.

Likeliest finals (BOS–DAL)probability
2–2 7.6% what happened — regulation ended tied; DAL won in OT
3–3 7.0% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–4 4.4%
1–3 4.2%
2–3 3.7%
6.8%4.6%018.1%14.1%124.3%21.6%221.8%22.1%314.9%17.2%48.2%10.8%53.8%5.6%61.5%2.5%70.7%1.4%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

🔒 pregame · this game

The engine made DAL a 56.5% favorite — DAL controls 53.2% of the predicted xG. Of BOS's 2.71 expected goals, 2.03 should come at 5v5 and 0.55 on the power play; DAL projects 1.96 at 5v5 and 0.82 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 57.2%, Elo at 59.2%.

Why DAL 56.5%
win chance× expected goals
home ice +3.6 DAL ×1.08 · BOS ×1.00
5v5 play +2.5 DAL ×0.98 · BOS ×0.93
finishing −0.5 DAL ×1.06 · BOS ×1.08
goaltending +0.3 DAL ×0.95 · BOS ×0.94
special teams +0.2 DAL ×1.01 · BOS ×1.00
schedule +0.0 DAL ×1.00 · BOS ×1.00

Win chance is in points toward DAL (bars right of the line push toward DAL, left toward BOS). Each win-chance number is one-at-a-time: that piece reset to league average (neutral ice, a typical night's rest) on both sides and the game re-priced; the pieces interact, so they don't add up to the call. The multipliers are exact: a league-average team on neutral ice, on a typical night's rest, would expect 2.88 goals in this game, and each side's expected goals is that times its column of multipliers. Special teams reads small because the engine's power-play terms fit near zero, not because special teams don't matter.

Where the engine expected the goals

🔒 pregame · this game

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). BOS attacks the left net, DAL the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Context

Tale of the tape

season to date

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

BOSDAL
3.01 (15th) Offense
xG for / game
2.91 (19th)
2.93 (15th) Defense
xG against / game
2.57 (4th)
0.63 (26th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.81 (13th)
0.70 (12th) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.60 (5th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →