xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · EDM skaters · VAN skaters · EDM lines · VAN lines · Matchups

EDM 9 – 7 VAN

Edmonton Oilers at Vancouver Canucks

Final · Oct 1, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
EDM 61.3% ✓
expected 3.61–2.91 · EDM won 9–7
actual xG
3.64–2.76
xG share, predicted → actual
EDM 55% → 57%45% → 43% VAN
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
On the ice
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from EDM's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = EDM power play · PK = VAN power play · Leading = EDM ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

EDM attacks◀ all strengths
VAN attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: EDM attacks the left net, VAN the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 283 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from EDM's side and mirrored for VAN: “EDM PP” shows EDM's power-play attempts on the left and VAN's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · this game
EDM VAN
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
9 7
Expected goals
3.65 2.77
xG%share of xG
57% 43%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
6 3
Shots on goal
32 22
Attempts
57 50
xG by period · whole game 1st1.7–0.12nd1.3–0.73rd0.6–2.0

The Oilers beat the Canucks 9–7 on the road, and the chances agreed: EDM out-created VAN 3.6–2.8 in expected goals. EDM scored 9 on 3.6 expected.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

all situations · this game
cumulative EDM − VAN xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+1−1+2−2EDM AHEAD ▲VAN AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative EDM minus VAN expected goals. Above zero EDM is ahead on chances, below zero VAN is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Goals

this game
xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
EDMVasily Podkolzin 1st9:26 PP 0.15
EDMOwen Michaels 1st14:26 0.19
EDMEvan Bouchard 1st14:42 0.25
EDMRyan Shea 1st19:32 0.16
EDMLeon Draisaitl 2nd0:27 0.03
EDMTrent Frederic 2nd5:04 0.25
EDMConnor McDavid 2nd7:49 SH 0.06
EDMKasperi Kapanen 2nd8:23 SH 0.25
EDMLeon Draisaitl 3rd9:26 PP 0.07
VANPaul Cotter 2nd4:31 0.18
VANBrock Boeser 2nd5:47 0.01
VANArshdeep Bains 2nd19:59 0.06
VANMarco Rossi 3rd1:53 0.39
VANMarco Rossi 3rd4:43 0.17
VANElias Pettersson 3rd7:37 PP 0.06
VANJamie Oleksiak 3rd18:31 0.07
Who

Skaters

all · whole game · this game
on-ice xG for and against, his own attempts, the net
strength
period
sort
How to read this

Every skater: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time. The chart opens sorted by net, best first; pick another key to re-order it, and click the same key again to flip it. A name opens the player's page. Pick a period and every bar re-lays for that period alone on the same scale as the whole game, so the three periods add up to it; a skater who did not play in it fades to the bottom.

EDM
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5222.52.50Leon DraisaitlF20:19+1.97Connor McDavidF22:03+1.77Evan BouchardD24:21+1.53Vasily PodkolzinF18:04+1.38Trent FredericF10:55+1.03Isaac HowardF10:58+0.90Mattias EkholmD20:42+0.45Josh SamanskiF8:41+0.26Kasperi KapanenF18:48+0.08Ryan SheaD23:05+0.08Jake WalmanD13:02-0.22Mathieu JosephF15:07-0.35Connor MurphyD24:47-0.43Owen MichaelsF13:23-0.67Alex FormentonF16:15-0.71Colton DachF12:46-0.79Max JonesF11:41-0.92Shakir MukhamadullinD10:01-0.94
0.50.5111.51.50Connor McDavidF14:28+0.82Leon DraisaitlF14:50+0.77Vasily PodkolzinF14:02+0.55Evan BouchardD17:48+0.51Trent FredericF8:16+0.46Mattias EkholmD17:06+0.46Isaac HowardF8:33+0.33Josh SamanskiF8:41+0.26Ryan SheaD18:06+0.10Alex FormentonF12:51-0.36Connor MurphyD21:31-0.43Jake WalmanD9:56-0.48Mathieu JosephF12:48-0.58Owen MichaelsF12:09-0.66Colton DachF10:49-0.89Max JonesF10:55-0.92Shakir MukhamadullinD10:01-0.94Kasperi KapanenF12:44-0.96
0.50.5111.51.50Leon DraisaitlF4:41+1.30Connor McDavidF4:39+1.30Evan BouchardD4:36+1.14Kasperi KapanenF4:05+0.83Vasily PodkolzinF4:02+0.83Trent FredericF2:39+0.57Isaac HowardF2:25+0.57Jake WalmanD2:12+0.26Ryan SheaD2:07+0.10Colton DachF1:15+0.10Max JonesF0:46+0.00Mattias EkholmD0:19+0.00Mathieu JosephF0:07+0.00Owen MichaelsF0:07+0.00
0.250.250.50.50Mathieu JosephF2:01+0.22Kasperi KapanenF1:48+0.22Jake WalmanD0:54+0.00Colton DachF0:42+0.00Mattias EkholmD3:06-0.00Connor MurphyD3:05-0.00Owen MichaelsF0:56-0.01Leon DraisaitlF0:03-0.10Ryan SheaD2:07-0.12Evan BouchardD1:12-0.12Alex FormentonF2:39-0.35Connor McDavidF2:11-0.35
VAN
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Marco RossiF15:16+0.76Jake DeBruskF15:37+0.59Brock BoeserF18:38+0.41Elias PetterssonF17:36+0.40Jonathan LekkerimakiF12:04+0.29Luke SchennD14:02+0.18Brendan GallagherF11:08-0.03Arshdeep BainsF11:29-0.11Tom WillanderD21:11-0.21Elias PetterssonD16:17-0.22Jamie OleksiakD21:19-0.24Drew O'ConnorF13:23-0.42Max SassonF13:36-0.51Linus KarlssonF13:47-0.54Zeev BuiumD20:58-0.58Liam OhgrenF18:33-0.78Filip HronekD23:02-0.94Paul CotterF16:12-0.95
0.50.5111.51.50Elias PetterssonD12:43+0.73Luke SchennD12:40+0.65Jonathan LekkerimakiF10:17+0.51Marco RossiF10:54+0.40Elias PetterssonF10:42+0.34Arshdeep BainsF10:34+0.28Jake DeBruskF11:25+0.24Jamie OleksiakD18:01+0.21Tom WillanderD18:00+0.20Brendan GallagherF10:09+0.13Liam OhgrenF14:23+0.06Brock BoeserF14:18+0.06Paul CotterF14:13-0.18Max SassonF10:58-0.18Drew O'ConnorF11:19-0.19Linus KarlssonF11:55-0.31Zeev BuiumD18:27-0.46Filip HronekD14:27-0.55
0.250.250.50.50Filip HronekD3:36+0.35Elias PetterssonF3:24+0.35Brock BoeserF3:19+0.35Marco RossiF3:17+0.35Jake DeBruskF3:16+0.35Max SassonF0:11+0.00Drew O'ConnorF0:06+0.00Zeev BuiumD1:35-0.12Tom WillanderD1:52-0.23Jonathan LekkerimakiF1:47-0.23Liam OhgrenF1:47-0.23Linus KarlssonF1:45-0.23
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Marco RossiF0:09+0.00Linus KarlssonF0:07+0.00Brock BoeserF0:05+0.00Brendan GallagherF0:59-0.16Tom WillanderD1:19-0.18Drew O'ConnorF1:58-0.24Elias PetterssonF2:34-0.29Max SassonF2:27-0.32Arshdeep BainsF0:55-0.39Jamie OleksiakD3:18-0.45Luke SchennD1:22-0.47Liam OhgrenF2:23-0.61Filip HronekD4:03-0.74Paul CotterF1:59-0.78Elias PetterssonD3:34-0.95

Lines & pairs

all · whole game · this game
most-used units · when they played · on-ice xG lines are by strength · 5v5 shown
strength
period
sort
How to read this

The units that actually played together most at the chosen strength — forward lines and defence pairs at 5v5, the whole group on the ice on the power play or the kill — each with when it was on the ice at that strength across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against / for while the whole unit was out, at that strength only. Sorted by time together; pick another key to re-order, and a name opens the player's page. Pick a period and the strip veils the rest of the game while the bars re-lay for that period alone, on the whole game's scale.

EDM
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
VAN
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF

Matchups

5v5 · this game
every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
order
EDM won the chances VAN won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
MeriläinenLankinenBoeserCotterOhgrenDeBruskPetterssonKarlssonGallagherO'ConnorSassonRossiBainsLekkerimakiOleksiakWillanderHronekBuiumSchennPetterssonGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3LeviDraisaitlMcDavidPodkolzinJosephFormentonMichaelsKapanenJonesDachFredericHowardSamanskiMurphySheaEkholmBouchardWalmanMukhamadullin
How to read this

Rows are EDM's skaters, columns VAN's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

The model

The prediction, scored

🔒 pregame · this game

Before puck drop the engine made EDM a 61.3% favorite, expecting a 3.61–2.91 game — EDM won 9–7, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
EDM 3.613.64 2.361.94 1.091.40
VAN 2.912.76 1.892.33 0.850.44

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

🔒 pregame · this game

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ EDM · ■ VAN.

Likeliest finals (EDM–VAN)probability
3–3 6.7% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–2 5.8% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–2 4.6%
4–4 4.4% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
3–1 3.5%
9–7 0.0% what happened
2.7%5.6%09.8%16.0%117.5%23.1%220.9%22.2%319.0%16.1%413.9%9.4%58.5%4.6%64.5%2.0%73.1%1.0%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

🔒 pregame · this game

The engine made EDM a 61.3% favorite — VAN controls 44.6% of the predicted xG. Of EDM's 3.61 expected goals, 2.36 should come at 5v5 and 1.09 on the power play; VAN projects 1.89 at 5v5 and 0.85 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 35.6%, Elo at 46.7%.

Where the engine expected the goals

🔒 pregame · this game

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). EDM attacks the left net, VAN the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Context

Tale of the tape

season to date

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

EDMVAN
2.71 (25th) Offense
xG for / game
2.32 (31st)
2.68 (8th) Defense
xG against / game
3.42 (31st)
0.86 (8th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.67 (23rd)
0.75 (19th) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.87 (24th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →