xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · BOS skaters · STL skaters · BOS lines · STL lines · Matchups

BOS 1 – 4 STL

Boston Bruins at St. Louis Blues

Final · Oct 29, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
STL 50.7% ✓
expected 3.03–3.04 · STL won 1–4
actual xG
2.31–2.32
xG share, predicted → actual
BOS 50% → 50%50% → 50% STL
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
On the ice
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from BOS's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = BOS power play · PK = STL power play · Leading = BOS ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

BOS attacks◀ all strengths
STL attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: BOS attacks the left net, STL the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 283 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from BOS's side and mirrored for STL: “BOS PP” shows BOS's power-play attempts on the left and STL's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · this game
BOS STL
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
1 4
Expected goals
2.31 2.32
xG%share of xG
50% 50%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
3 2
Shots on goal
31 18
Attempts
66 38
xG by period · whole game 1st0.7–1.02nd0.7–0.63rd0.9–0.7

The Blues beat the Bruins 4–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, BOS 2.3 to STL 2.3 in expected goals. At 5v5: BOS 1.9, STL 1.9.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

all situations · this game
cumulative BOS − STL xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+0.5−0.5+1−1BOS AHEAD ▲STL AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative BOS minus STL expected goals. Above zero BOS is ahead on chances, below zero STL is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Goals

this game
xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
BOSJames Hagens 1st5:28 0.05
STLJimmy Snuggerud 1st15:43 PP 0.13
STLPhilip Broberg 2nd5:17 0.11
STLRobert Thomas 2nd12:08 0.08
STLJake Neighbours 3rd12:42 PP 0.14
Who

Skaters

all · whole game · this game
on-ice xG for and against, his own attempts, the net
strength
period
sort
How to read this

Every skater: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time. The chart opens sorted by net, best first; pick another key to re-order it, and click the same key again to flip it. A name opens the player's page. Pick a period and every bar re-lays for that period alone on the same scale as the whole game, so the three periods add up to it; a skater who did not play in it fades to the bottom.

BOS
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.50JJ PeterkaF18:19+0.99David PastrnakF21:28+0.97Fraser MintenF15:50+0.49Hampus LindholmD23:21+0.30Charlie McAvoyD23:56+0.28Pavel ZachaF21:00+0.26Morgan GeekieF15:20+0.05Mason LohreiD18:28-0.01Tanner JeannotF10:51-0.07Marat KhusnutdinovF12:16-0.13Connor CliftonD14:12-0.23Mark KastelicF10:11-0.28William BorgenD17:25-0.29Matthew PoitrasF8:52-0.36James HagensF15:42-0.38Nikita ZadorovD19:05-0.38Elias LindholmF15:36-0.42Casey MittelstadtF15:58-0.49
0.50.5110David PastrnakF18:56+0.87JJ PeterkaF16:21+0.80Fraser MintenF13:07+0.42Pavel ZachaF18:09+0.40Hampus LindholmD22:45+0.30Charlie McAvoyD21:17+0.27Marat KhusnutdinovF11:28+0.14William BorgenD16:02+0.08Nikita ZadorovD17:33-0.01Morgan GeekieF13:09-0.05Tanner JeannotF9:59-0.07Mark KastelicF9:50-0.18Connor CliftonD13:41-0.23Mason LohreiD16:27-0.28Matthew PoitrasF8:52-0.36Elias LindholmF12:54-0.52James HagensF14:09-0.57Casey MittelstadtF14:31-0.68
0.250.250.50.50Mason LohreiD1:50+0.27JJ PeterkaF1:49+0.19Fraser MintenF1:49+0.19James HagensF1:33+0.19Casey MittelstadtF1:27+0.19David PastrnakF2:32+0.10Pavel ZachaF2:11+0.10Morgan GeekieF2:11+0.10Elias LindholmF2:08+0.10Charlie McAvoyD2:05+0.02William BorgenD0:20+0.00Nikita ZadorovD0:05+0.00
0.250.250.50.50Tanner JeannotF0:52+0.00Hampus LindholmD0:36+0.00Elias LindholmF0:34+0.00Charlie McAvoyD0:34+0.00Connor CliftonD0:31+0.00Mason LohreiD0:11+0.00JJ PeterkaF0:09+0.00Mark KastelicF0:21-0.10Fraser MintenF0:54-0.13Pavel ZachaF0:40-0.24Marat KhusnutdinovF0:48-0.26Nikita ZadorovD1:27-0.37William BorgenD1:03-0.37
STL
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.50Mason McTavishF15:20+1.21Pavel BuchnevichF15:55+0.57Justin BarronD15:24+0.51Adam JiricekD18:03+0.50Jimmy SnuggerudF15:18+0.34Jake NeighboursF13:45+0.20Jonatan BerggrenF13:17+0.20Dylan HollowayF15:25+0.09Robert ThomasF18:42+0.03Dalibor DvorskyF11:49-0.16Cam FowlerD21:35-0.19Pius SuterF14:39-0.21Philip BrobergD25:55-0.28Aleksanteri KaskimakiF13:10-0.34Colton ParaykoD17:31-0.39Brandon CarloD20:24-0.48Alexey ToropchenkoF14:30-0.59Connor McMichaelF15:18-0.64
0.50.5110Mason McTavishF14:12+0.84Pavel BuchnevichF13:25+0.59Justin BarronD15:24+0.51Adam JiricekD17:11+0.50Jonatan BerggrenF13:17+0.20Dylan HollowayF14:28+0.09Jimmy SnuggerudF14:09-0.03Cam FowlerD18:43-0.06Robert ThomasF16:48-0.15Dalibor DvorskyF11:49-0.16Jake NeighboursF12:36-0.17Colton ParaykoD14:53-0.18Pius SuterF12:35-0.19Aleksanteri KaskimakiF11:51-0.26Brandon CarloD18:54-0.39Connor McMichaelF13:17-0.45Philip BrobergD22:38-0.49Alexey ToropchenkoF13:00-0.50
0.250.250.50.50Jake NeighboursF1:09+0.37Jimmy SnuggerudF1:09+0.37Robert ThomasF1:08+0.37Mason McTavishF1:08+0.37Philip BrobergD1:07+0.37Cam FowlerD1:03+0.00Dylan HollowayF0:57+0.00Connor McMichaelF0:55+0.00Pavel BuchnevichF0:54+0.00Adam JiricekD0:52+0.00Pius SuterF0:09+0.00Brandon CarloD0:07+0.00Alexey ToropchenkoF0:07+0.00Aleksanteri KaskimakiF0:05+0.00
0.250.250.50.50Pius SuterF1:55-0.02Pavel BuchnevichF1:36-0.02Brandon CarloD1:23-0.08Alexey ToropchenkoF1:23-0.08Aleksanteri KaskimakiF1:14-0.08Cam FowlerD1:49-0.13Philip BrobergD2:10-0.16Connor McMichaelF1:06-0.19Robert ThomasF0:46-0.19Colton ParaykoD2:38-0.21

Lines & pairs

all · whole game · this game
most-used units · when they played · on-ice xG lines are by strength · 5v5 shown
strength
period
sort
How to read this

The units that actually played together most at the chosen strength — forward lines and defence pairs at 5v5, the whole group on the ice on the power play or the kill — each with when it was on the ice at that strength across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against / for while the whole unit was out, at that strength only. Sorted by time together; pick another key to re-order, and a name opens the player's page. Pick a period and the strip veils the rest of the game while the bars re-lay for that period alone, on the whole game's scale.

BOS
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
STL
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF

Matchups

5v5 · this game
every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
order
BOS won the chances STL won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
HoferThomasNeighboursSnuggerudToropchenkoSuterKaskimakiBuchnevichBerggrenMcTavishMcMichaelHollowayDvorskyCarloBrobergFowlerParaykoBarronJiricekGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3SwaymanPastrnakZachaPeterkaLindholmMittelstadtHagensJeannotKastelicPoitrasGeekieKhusnutdinovMintenLindholmMcAvoyZadorovBorgenCliftonLohrei
How to read this

Rows are BOS's skaters, columns STL's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

The model

The prediction, scored

🔒 pregame · this game

Before puck drop the engine made STL a 50.7% favorite, expecting a 3.03–3.04 game — STL won 1–4, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
BOS 3.032.31 2.291.95 0.610.36
STL 3.042.32 2.181.89 0.660.37

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

🔒 pregame · this game

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ BOS · ■ STL.

Likeliest finals (BOS–STL)probability
3–3 7.1% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–2 7.0% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–4 4.1% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–4 4.0%
4–2 3.9%
1–4 2.6% what happened
4.9%4.8%014.7%14.6%122.1%22.0%222.2%22.2%316.8%16.9%410.3%10.4%55.3%5.4%62.3%2.4%71.3%1.3%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

🔒 pregame · this game

The engine made STL a 50.7% favorite — STL controls 50.1% of the predicted xG. Of BOS's 3.03 expected goals, 2.29 should come at 5v5 and 0.61 on the power play; STL projects 2.18 at 5v5 and 0.66 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 50.4%, Elo at 53.4%.

Why STL 50.7%
win chance× expected goals
home ice +3.6 STL ×1.08 · BOS ×1.00
goaltending −2.9 STL ×0.92 · BOS ×0.98
5v5 play +2.4 STL ×1.03 · BOS ×0.98
finishing −2.1 STL ×1.04 · BOS ×1.09
special teams −0.7 STL ×0.99 · BOS ×1.00
schedule +0.0 STL ×1.00 · BOS ×1.00

Win chance is in points toward STL (bars right of the line push toward STL, left toward BOS). Each win-chance number is one-at-a-time: that piece reset to league average (neutral ice, a typical night's rest) on both sides and the game re-priced; the pieces interact, so they don't add up to the call. The multipliers are exact: a league-average team on neutral ice, on a typical night's rest, would expect 2.88 goals in this game, and each side's expected goals is that times its column of multipliers. Special teams reads small because the engine's power-play terms fit near zero, not because special teams don't matter.

Where the engine expected the goals

🔒 pregame · this game

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). BOS attacks the left net, STL the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Context

Tale of the tape

season to date

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

BOSSTL
3.01 (15th) Offense
xG for / game
2.86 (22nd)
2.93 (15th) Defense
xG against / game
2.80 (14th)
0.63 (26th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.63 (28th)
0.70 (12th) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.64 (8th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →